It's one of those nights where you're walking home from the coffee shop and you're passing an unlit streetlight and you spit and the light flickers, flares and joins its brothers and sisters in consistent illumination and it shocks you for a minute but you keep going. Then, a few minutes later, another unlit streetlight and perhaps coincidentally, perhaps through some subconcious reflex, you spit again and that streetlight, too, flickers and flares and lights.
This time you're less shocked and more amused at the absurd parallelism. So the next time you see an unlit streetlight, about a block from home, you spit again. And that streetlight flickers and flares and lights. And then you start to think you can light streetlights with your mind--figuring maybe that your brain configures itself in such a way when you spit to send electric impulses to the fuse or whatever and you're something like a god. A god of streetlights, sure, but in this day and age where society seems to be relentlessly searching for new gods, who the fuck is gonna split hairs?
So I figure now is as good a time as any to tell you all something that'll humble me a little in immediate and obvious ways; and in more subtle ways that will only become apparent as the days and months and years pass.
The room is dark and it smells like cigarette smoke and cinnamon. You can't see it but you can picture the whisp of smoke still coming off the Christmas candle she just blew out.
"I just get bitchy and discouraged when I read something that I don't think is as good as what I write," I say. She's annoyed with me because I criticized the book she was reading to me from. "I mean, it's ridiculous to me that something that bland and shapeless could get published."
"Well then why don't you get published? Bitching about other people's work won't do it. Get yourself out there."
I snort and say, "You have no idea how hard I've tried."
"Okay, okay. Don't get defensive. I'm just saying, I've never seen you try so..."
She's got a point.
I roll over and close my eyes, picturing pages and pages of manuscripts I've turned out over the years and I have to admit, yeah, a lot of them are bad. Worse than bad.
There are the stories I write and the sotries I talk about writing. Probably the most famous of the latter group would be the novel that has gone by titles like Fucked Up!, How Could Hell Be Any Worse?, So Much Worse, Those Wretched, Those Doomed, The Doomed Ones, The Cursed Ones and The Book of Anathema among some other painfully cheery names. (And I swear it only occurs to me now how dreary and depressing those titles are.)
This is the book I've told people I intend to work up to. The magnum opus, my sure-fire materpiece. The epic dystopian satire weaving the first-person life stories of six semi-related people. The novel that begins on or around September 11th 2001 and ends some fifty or sixty years later. I imagine something in the nieghbourhood of 600-800 pages at least, despite my commitment to minimalism.
When I describe my idea to people they ask why I don't start it now. My response is usually some variation of this:
"I'm smart enough to know I'm not ready to take on something so big yet. I don't have the skill to tell it, the focus to research it or the simple ability to fix it when I fuck it up--which I will."
But lying in bed with nothing to show for years of honing my craft, studying the conventions and tricks and traditions, I have to admit that the reasons seem flimsy when sales of novels like the Twilight series are surpasing other lousy books like the Harry Potter series.
Seems to me I'm just scared that my best idea won't be good enough. And that reason, well, it's definitely not good enough.
The concept of this novel started with a loose collection of ideas that seemed related in some way. Ideas that actually, over the ten-or-so-years since they first came to me, have made friends of newer ideas and become my personal philosophy. A philosophy that, while I haven't the arrogance to call finished, doesn't take up as much of my time anymore. Less time is spent trying to piece it together and turn it over in my mind to check it for holes. Now it functions more as a backdrop to my life. Or better still, as a lens through which I view the world. A lens that helps me understand myself, the world and my relationship to it much better.
The philosophy seems to be ready to go. And this book was always supposed to be that outlet for me, a means of expressing my worldview sort of like Ayn Rand's The Fountainhead (except, you know, comprehensible and well-written). So why not start it? It was a question I couldn't answer without making sorry excuses that did little but veil the afforementioned fear.
So start it I shall.
As of Monday I begin the considerable research period that will be required to make this story work. I've got a reading list a mile long that will take me at least three or four weeks to work my way through (and this is ignoring the very real possibility that those books will bring others to light that will also need to be read).
I've written things before that required research. I think the longest I've ever spent researching a single story was somewhere in the nieghbourhood of two weeks. This is an entierly different animal. There will be much note-taking, cross-referencing and mucking about with unwieldy volumes on topics ranging from Existentialism to Native story telling to corporate law.
I also believe I will need to do something I said I would never do: plot the story in advance. This will be my first attempt at writing something big enough to lose characters in, to tear holes in the plot or to suffer from any chronological errors. While I've always said one shouldn't know where a story is going until it's been told, I don't think it could hurt to plot certain check-points along the way to make sure my characters don't get lost, wind up in two places at once or die and return fifty pages later.
Also, I need to decide who my characters are. I have six of them to tell the story and they all have important parts to play in it. But I think it would be a mistake to give them life before I really know who they are. This is the first time I will write more than one character at a time and I don't want to make the mistake of playing favourites or giving too little time or attention to any of them. I may go so far as to fill up a notebook on each character so I know them and have reference material on them when I begin.
All in all I figure the prep-time on this beast will take me well into the New Year. I also think that once all the research is done and the plot drawn up and the characters fully realised I'll want to take a break. After that, there's a very good chance that fear will hamper my ability to begin the novel for a couple of weeks.
By that time I'll probably be back in school or getting very close to it so that will obviously slow down the writing process a great deal. Granted, in the past when I had ten or more hours a day to dedicate to writing I could crap out a novella in a couple of weeks. (Which, I know, seems fast. But consider the fact that I am a minimalist and I don't cut things out--I write fiction that way naturally so revisions are usually pretty short because even novels are pretty short.)
I don't harbour any illusions that this will come as quickly or even be presentable after the first draught. Even if I were to find ten hour days to work on it, this is a more involved piece of writing than I've ever attempted. What I'm saying is, I'll consider myself successful if I manage to finish a first draught before the apocalypse my story will attempt to predict occurs.
But I will begin it. I won't give it a name. I won't talk a lot about it--maybe I won't talk about it at all. But I'll do it. I'll work on it. And maybe it'll take years to finish, maybe I'll write other things in between and during breaks. But I'm not going to put it off anymore.
This time you're less shocked and more amused at the absurd parallelism. So the next time you see an unlit streetlight, about a block from home, you spit again. And that streetlight flickers and flares and lights. And then you start to think you can light streetlights with your mind--figuring maybe that your brain configures itself in such a way when you spit to send electric impulses to the fuse or whatever and you're something like a god. A god of streetlights, sure, but in this day and age where society seems to be relentlessly searching for new gods, who the fuck is gonna split hairs?
So I figure now is as good a time as any to tell you all something that'll humble me a little in immediate and obvious ways; and in more subtle ways that will only become apparent as the days and months and years pass.
The room is dark and it smells like cigarette smoke and cinnamon. You can't see it but you can picture the whisp of smoke still coming off the Christmas candle she just blew out.
"I just get bitchy and discouraged when I read something that I don't think is as good as what I write," I say. She's annoyed with me because I criticized the book she was reading to me from. "I mean, it's ridiculous to me that something that bland and shapeless could get published."
"Well then why don't you get published? Bitching about other people's work won't do it. Get yourself out there."
I snort and say, "You have no idea how hard I've tried."
"Okay, okay. Don't get defensive. I'm just saying, I've never seen you try so..."
She's got a point.
I roll over and close my eyes, picturing pages and pages of manuscripts I've turned out over the years and I have to admit, yeah, a lot of them are bad. Worse than bad.
There are the stories I write and the sotries I talk about writing. Probably the most famous of the latter group would be the novel that has gone by titles like Fucked Up!, How Could Hell Be Any Worse?, So Much Worse, Those Wretched, Those Doomed, The Doomed Ones, The Cursed Ones and The Book of Anathema among some other painfully cheery names. (And I swear it only occurs to me now how dreary and depressing those titles are.)
This is the book I've told people I intend to work up to. The magnum opus, my sure-fire materpiece. The epic dystopian satire weaving the first-person life stories of six semi-related people. The novel that begins on or around September 11th 2001 and ends some fifty or sixty years later. I imagine something in the nieghbourhood of 600-800 pages at least, despite my commitment to minimalism.
When I describe my idea to people they ask why I don't start it now. My response is usually some variation of this:
"I'm smart enough to know I'm not ready to take on something so big yet. I don't have the skill to tell it, the focus to research it or the simple ability to fix it when I fuck it up--which I will."
But lying in bed with nothing to show for years of honing my craft, studying the conventions and tricks and traditions, I have to admit that the reasons seem flimsy when sales of novels like the Twilight series are surpasing other lousy books like the Harry Potter series.
Seems to me I'm just scared that my best idea won't be good enough. And that reason, well, it's definitely not good enough.
The concept of this novel started with a loose collection of ideas that seemed related in some way. Ideas that actually, over the ten-or-so-years since they first came to me, have made friends of newer ideas and become my personal philosophy. A philosophy that, while I haven't the arrogance to call finished, doesn't take up as much of my time anymore. Less time is spent trying to piece it together and turn it over in my mind to check it for holes. Now it functions more as a backdrop to my life. Or better still, as a lens through which I view the world. A lens that helps me understand myself, the world and my relationship to it much better.
The philosophy seems to be ready to go. And this book was always supposed to be that outlet for me, a means of expressing my worldview sort of like Ayn Rand's The Fountainhead (except, you know, comprehensible and well-written). So why not start it? It was a question I couldn't answer without making sorry excuses that did little but veil the afforementioned fear.
So start it I shall.
As of Monday I begin the considerable research period that will be required to make this story work. I've got a reading list a mile long that will take me at least three or four weeks to work my way through (and this is ignoring the very real possibility that those books will bring others to light that will also need to be read).
I've written things before that required research. I think the longest I've ever spent researching a single story was somewhere in the nieghbourhood of two weeks. This is an entierly different animal. There will be much note-taking, cross-referencing and mucking about with unwieldy volumes on topics ranging from Existentialism to Native story telling to corporate law.
I also believe I will need to do something I said I would never do: plot the story in advance. This will be my first attempt at writing something big enough to lose characters in, to tear holes in the plot or to suffer from any chronological errors. While I've always said one shouldn't know where a story is going until it's been told, I don't think it could hurt to plot certain check-points along the way to make sure my characters don't get lost, wind up in two places at once or die and return fifty pages later.
Also, I need to decide who my characters are. I have six of them to tell the story and they all have important parts to play in it. But I think it would be a mistake to give them life before I really know who they are. This is the first time I will write more than one character at a time and I don't want to make the mistake of playing favourites or giving too little time or attention to any of them. I may go so far as to fill up a notebook on each character so I know them and have reference material on them when I begin.
All in all I figure the prep-time on this beast will take me well into the New Year. I also think that once all the research is done and the plot drawn up and the characters fully realised I'll want to take a break. After that, there's a very good chance that fear will hamper my ability to begin the novel for a couple of weeks.
By that time I'll probably be back in school or getting very close to it so that will obviously slow down the writing process a great deal. Granted, in the past when I had ten or more hours a day to dedicate to writing I could crap out a novella in a couple of weeks. (Which, I know, seems fast. But consider the fact that I am a minimalist and I don't cut things out--I write fiction that way naturally so revisions are usually pretty short because even novels are pretty short.)
I don't harbour any illusions that this will come as quickly or even be presentable after the first draught. Even if I were to find ten hour days to work on it, this is a more involved piece of writing than I've ever attempted. What I'm saying is, I'll consider myself successful if I manage to finish a first draught before the apocalypse my story will attempt to predict occurs.
But I will begin it. I won't give it a name. I won't talk a lot about it--maybe I won't talk about it at all. But I'll do it. I'll work on it. And maybe it'll take years to finish, maybe I'll write other things in between and during breaks. But I'm not going to put it off anymore.